Predict
/
All markets
Sports

LoL: Karmine Corp vs T1 (BO5) - Worlds Playoffs

Karmine CorpWaiting for the feed…
  • Match Winner
  • Game Handicap: T1 (-1.5) vs Karmine Corp (+1.5)
  • Game Handicap: T1 (-2.5) vs Karmine Corp (+2.5)
$513K volume
Closes in 9h
active

Order book

Yes · cents
—Spread —

Waiting for the feed…

Last trades
live
Side
Price
Size
Time
Buy Yes
50.0
380
12:04:11
Sell Yes
49.9
3,377
12:04:03
Buy Yes
49.8
4,350
12:03:05
Buy Yes
49.7
2,642
12:03:13
Sell Yes
49.6
1,353
12:02:21
LoL: Karmine Corp vs T1 (BO5) - Worlds Playoffs
$513K volume · active
—…
Additional contextCloses in 9h

One of the outcomes of “LoL: Karmine Corp vs T1 (BO5) - Worlds Playoffs”. Outcomes: Karmine Corp / T1. Catalogue status: active.

This market refers to the LoL Quarterfinal 2 match between Karmine Corp and T1 in the Worlds Playoffs, initially scheduled for November 4, 2026 at 5:00 PM ET. This market will resolve to "Karmine Corp" if Karmine Corp win the match against T1. This market will resolve to "T1" if T1 win the match against Karmine Corp. If the match is canceled (not played at all) or ends in a tie, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match is postponed, it must be rescheduled to a start time on or before November 18, 2026 at 11:59 PM ET (14 calendar days after the originally scheduled start of November 4, 2026 at 5:00 PM ET). If, by that deadline, the most recently announced rescheduled start time is on or before the deadline, this market resolves based on the result of the match as played. Otherwise, this market resolves 50-50, regardless of whether the match is subsequently played. If the match begins but is not completed, and one team wins due to the opponent's forfeiture, disqualification, or walkover, this market will resolve to the team who wins. If the match ends in a forfeit, disqualification, or walkover (team withdraws before the start and the other wins automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The resolution source for this market will be official information from https://gol.gg/esports/home. However, if https://gol.gg/esports/home has not published final results within 2 hours after the event’s conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead including video evidence. In cases where a team’s listed name includes minor discrepancies from the resolution source, this market will resolve based on the underlying real-world match rather than exact name matching. Recognizable abbreviations, alternate or erroneous spellings, sponsor tags, affiliate or academy designations, regional identifiers, and minor formatting differences will be treated as referring to the same team, provided the intended team can be clearly and uniquely identified within the relevant competition. If a listed team name has no reasonable connection to any participating team, or if it matches or could reasonably refer to another team in the same competition such that the intended team cannot be unambiguously determined, this market will resolve 50-50.

Positions

Discussion

8 comments
Share your read on this market…
Holding YesAdd source
delta_longNo · 4.2K2h ago

The committee calendar is the whole trade. There are eleven session days before the recess and the bill is not on the docket — anything that slips past October has to survive a lame-duck floor fight.

Reply···
arb_rachel1h ago

Same read. I bought No at 22 and I am not touching it until the calendar changes.

41Reply
kmoon48m ago

The discharge petition is the tail risk everyone here keeps forgetting about.

12Reply
Reply to delta_long…
polyvoreYes · 1.1K5h ago

Industry groups are spending real money on this and the Treasury buyback headline gave the whole sector cover. The current price feels two or three points too cheap even with calendar risk.

Reply···
macro_tessNo · 7809h ago

Watch the Senate companion. If it is not marked up by mid-September this market goes to 5% and the spread will not let you out cleanly.

Reply···
jsinghYes · 3201d ago

Resolution language matters here: an amended bill that keeps the number still counts. That is a meaningfully wider path to Yes than people are pricing.

Reply···